Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while.
It may be a fluke, but I feel a little prescient. Almost a year ago, I asked Since this guy had his PETN explosive in his underwear, will we have to start taking ours off for TSA? The answer is apparently yes, though TSA is doing is doing this with a combination of (a) technology (full-body scanners) and (b) enhanced pat-downs in a coercive environment in place of traditional strip searches. In other words, TSA is making their employees into a combination of peepers and gropers, both varieties of sex offenders who would have to register with law enforcement (and would face jail time) if they weren't government employees.
I also said It looks to me like the bureaucrats of the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) really don't know what they're doing. As a result, they are mainly just hassling ordinary passengers without doing what's needed to make us safer. And I see no reason to change that assessment.
The bottom line is this: Limited by its bureaucrats' ideology, the TSA has no idea what to do to make actual improvements in aviation safety. So they opt for the politically correct solution, thereby harassing (sexually and otherwise) millions of passengers they already have reason to know are innocent while detecting no hijackers or terrorists. That's bureaucratic overreach at its best.
I would categorize this as deliberate stupidity. Somebody obviously said words like Do something, even if it's wrong.
As usual, Trever identifies the situation best.
It looks to me like the only solution is to disband the Transportation Security Agency and turn their responsibilities over to someone who at least has some concept of what the responsibility entails like concentrating on who gets on the plane, instead of assaulting everyone because TSA won't focus on actual (real and projected) threats.
That way, too, we can get away from the combination of political correctness run amok combined with bureaucratic overreach the current toxic combination that gives a program that fulfills bureaucracy's promise by being offensive, stupid, and ineffective.